With CEO Pay Ratio Effective Date Looming, There’s No Relief in Sight

As we mark the beginning of May, the January 1, 2018 effective date of the CEO pay ratio disclosure requirement is now only eight months away. Notwithstanding predictions following last November’s presidential election that this disclosure requirement would be quickly repealed, there has yet to be any action taken that would alter the looming effective date. Here’s where things stand as of May 5, 2017.

Congressional Developments

As expected, on April 26, 2017, the Financial CHOICE Act of 2017 (H.R. 10) was formally introduced in the House of Representatives. (The bill text is available here). Among other things, the bill contains a provision which would repeal Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the CEO pay ratio disclosure requirement. The bill was passed out of the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday, May 4th. Observers expect that the bill will be scheduled for a vote before the full House later this month.

It should be noted, however, that this is just the first step in what could be a long process. Once approved by the House of Representatives, the bill will go to the Senate for consideration, where passage in its current form is problematic. While many members of the Senate have expressed support for financial regulatory reform, some believe the CHOICE Act simply goes too far. As a result, it’s entirely possible that the Senate will opt to pursue reform legislation that is more limited in scope than the CHOICE Act, which could delay final consideration until next year.

Consequently, at the moment it appears increasingly unlikely that a comprehensive bill which includes repeal of the CEO pay ratio disclosure requirement will be enacted into law this year.

SEC Developments

On Monday, May 1, 2017, the Senate confirmed Jay Clayton as the new Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Subsequently, Mr. Clayton was sworn into his new position on Thursday, May 4th.

This development increases the Commission’s membership to three, with Republicans holding a 2–1 majority.

While earlier this year Acting SEC Chair Michael Piwowar solicited public comment on problems encountered by companies in complying with the CEO pay ratio disclosure requirement and directed the SEC Staff to reconsider the implementation of the rule based on these comments, it remains to be seen whether the Commission intends to take any remedial action prior to the end of the year.

Thus, to the extent that they have not already done so companies with calendar year-end fiscal years (for example, December 31st) should begin to consider how the CEO pay ratio rule will impact the preparation of their 2018 proxy statement and determine how they plan to go about identifying their “median employee,” the requirement that will consume the majority of their compliance efforts.

Need Assistance?

Compensia can assist companies in preparing their CEO pay ratio disclosure, including developing a process for identifying their “median employee.” If you would like assistance in understanding how the CEO pay ratio disclosure requirement will affect your company or preparing your initial CEO pay ratio disclosure, or if you have any questions on the subjects addressed in this Thoughtful Disclosure Alert, please contact Mark A. Borges.

Download a pdf of this article »

Related

SEC Proposes Significant Simplification of Executive Compensation Disclosure for Most Public Companies

Download a pdf of this article » On May 19, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed substantial changes to the filing categories for U.S. public company disclosure requirements. The primary intent of these changes is to reduce disclosure complexity and compliance costs to encourage more companies to go and stay public.   The proposal replaces the existing range of filer categories – large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies – with just two: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.  Non-accelerated filers, proposed as companies with a public float below $2 billion, would be eligible to follow a simplified regime akin to what is currently available to smaller reporting

Read More

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact