Should Outside Advisors Attend Executive Sessions of the Compensation Committee?

Both Nasdaq and NYSE rules require Boards to regularly schedule executive sessions. Nasdaq requires that the executive sessions consist of “independent directors” only, while the NYSE rules require separate meetings of all outside directors, whether or not they are independent.

Many companies extend this practice to Board committees, including the compensation committee. Giving the company’s outside directors an opportunity to candidly review and discuss potentially sensitive matters such as CEO pay and performance and other elements of executive pay without management in attendance can lead to effective and thoughtful deliberation and oversight.

It is not uncommon for compensation committees to include an executive session at the end of every compensation committee meeting to review matters presented and discussed at the meeting. As a general rule, compensation committees should include its outside advisors in these executive sessions.

With outside advisors in attendance, compensation committees can pursue more thoughtful and informed deliberations on executive pay matters. Moreover, the absence of management attendees will likely result in the advisor offering a more candid and open assessment of the company’s executive pay program and management’s executive pay recommendations. Finally, by engaging the expertise and experience of its outside advisors, the compensation committee strengthens the defensibility of its executive pay decisions, a lesson learned from the Disney and Cendant complaints.

While there may be situations where the outside advisor’s attendance is not appropriate, such as a discussion about succession planning or a review of the advisor’s performance, this should be the exception rather than the rule given the sensitivity, complexity and potential risk associated with executive pay matters.

Related

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Glass Lewis Publishes 2025 Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) recently announced the opening of its 2025 Policy Survey. Glass Lewis conducts its annual policy survey to inform its Benchmark Voting Policy Guidelines and to gather diverse perspectives on evolving governance and compensation practices. The 2025 survey covers a wide range of topics relevant to both proxy voting and broader stewardship efforts. While some questions are tailored to institutional respondents, Glass Lewis welcomes input from all market

Read More

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Publishes Annual Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) published its annual benchmark policy survey on July 24, slightly earlier than in recent years. The purpose of the survey is to gather feedback ISS will use to inform its benchmark voting policy for the coming year from a broad spectrum of stakeholders including institutional investors, public company executives, corporate directors and other interested market constituents. A summary of the key survey questions is provided below. We encourage you

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact