SEC Rule Change Requires Human Capital Resources Disclosure

Download a pdf of this article »

Responding to calls from investors, proxy advisory firms, and other stakeholders for companies to provide more information about their human capital management practices, the SEC has amended Regulation S-K, which details the information that public companies must include in their public federal securities law filings, requiring them to describe their human capital resources, including the human capital measures and objectives that the company focuses on in managing its business. This disclosure is required to the extent material to understanding the company’s business taken as a whole. The amendments are effective on November 9, 2020.

This Thoughtful Pay Alert summarizes this new human capital resources disclosure requirement and offers our preliminary thoughts on how companies may approach their initial disclosure.

The Disclosure Requirement

Before the amendments, the only required information related to human capital a company had to disclose was the total number of individuals it employed. The SEC now requires a company to describe its human capital resources (including the number of persons employed by the company) and any human capital measures or objectives that the company focuses on in managing the business (such as, depending on the nature of the company’s business and workforce, measures or objectives that address the development, attraction, and retention of personnel).

Neither the amendments, nor the SEC’s Adopting Release, however, define the term “human capital” nor prescribe the required form of disclosure. Rather, the amendments reflect a “principles-based” approach intended to give companies flexibility to determine what information is material to their current business circumstances and how to disclose it. While the SEC does not require the disclosure of any specific metrics, it has cited measures or objectives that address the attraction, development, and retention of personnel as examples of areas where disclosure (and related metrics) may be appropriate, but offers them simply as potentially relevant subjects.

Preparing for the New Disclosure

Given the limited time to prepare the new disclosure, we expect companies to move quickly over the next several months to get a firm grasp on their current human capital management policies and practices. This will likely involve looking at the human capital measures and objectives currently used in the management of the business and already publicly disclosed or reviewed internally with the Board. Close collaboration with the company’s human resources function to better understand how talent is managed and human capital matters are assessed internally will likely also be critical to enable a company to identify and prioritize the human capital objectives that are the key drivers of its performance and long-term value creation.

In terms of drafting the disclosure, in the absence of affirmative metrics from the SEC, we expect many companies will rely on private-sector standard setters (such as the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) and the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”)) that have arisen to serve the demand for environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) metrics for guidance. While each company will need to evaluate its own particular circumstances to identify its human capital resources and determine their materiaity to an understanding of its business, some of the broad categories that we expect to receive consideration include the following:

While the new disclosure is required in the annual report on Form 10-K, in recent years companies have been making effective use of their proxy statements and company websites to engage with investors and other stakeholders on the positive actions they have taken on key ESG issues. We expect this trend to continue when it comes to the required human capital resources disclosure. Consequently, we expect that over time companies will extend some of their current proxy and/or ESG disclosure practices to human capital resources matters, particularly when they have a positive story to tell.

Need Assistance?

Compensia has extensive experience working with legal counsel to help companies understand their disclosure obligations as they relate to their executive compensation program and other matters involving their workforce. If you would like assistance in determining how the new human capital resources disclosure rules may impact your current disclosure, including your proxy statement disclosure, or if you have any questions on the subjects addressed in this Thoughtful Pay Alert, please feel free to contact Mark A. Borges at 415.462.2995 or Jason Borrevik at 408.876.4035.

About Compensia:

Compensia, Inc. is a management consulting firm that provides executive compensation advisory services to Compensation Committees and senior management.

Related

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Glass Lewis Publishes 2025 Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) recently announced the opening of its 2025 Policy Survey. Glass Lewis conducts its annual policy survey to inform its Benchmark Voting Policy Guidelines and to gather diverse perspectives on evolving governance and compensation practices. The 2025 survey covers a wide range of topics relevant to both proxy voting and broader stewardship efforts. While some questions are tailored to institutional respondents, Glass Lewis welcomes input from all market

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact