Preparing for the Expiration of an Equity Plan “Evergreen” Feature

Download a pdf of this article »

In connection with their IPO, greater than 90% of technology and life sciences companies adopt equity compensation plans that contain an “evergreen” provision. These provisions provide for an automatic increase in the number of shares available for issuance under the plan (with a typical initial share pool of 8% to 12% of outstanding shares and a 4% to 5% annual increase in the technology sector) without requiring additional shareholder approval of the increase.

Consistent with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market, an evergreen provision may have a term of up to ten years. Although not required, many companies that adopted evergreen provisions in connection with their IPO also provided that their equity plan contain a fixed 10-year term that mirrors the term of the evergreen provision. As a result, these companies must ask their shareholders to approve a new equity plan as they near the 10-year anniversary of their IPO.

Typically, by evergreen and plan expiration, most companies are relatively “mature” and widely held by institutional shareholders whose support, absent a multi-class stock structure and/or insider voting control, will be required for the new equity plan. This Thoughtful Pay Alert provides an overview of the factors that companies that went public with an evergreen provision in the 2013-2016 time frame may wish to consider as they develop their new equity plans and submit them to shareholders for approval.

As you work your way through the above flow chart, note that each step can raise complicated questions. We find that early planning can often pay dividends – or in this case, shares. We regularly provide support and guidance across critical decision points, including pool size assessment, shareholder influence analysis, proxy advisor policies and shareholder engagement strategy. If an expiring evergreen is on your horizon, we are here to help.

Need Assistance?

Compensia has extensive experience in helping companies understand and address proxy advisory firm and institutional shareholder voting and engagement policies, corporate governance, and executive compensation policies. If you have any questions on the topics covered in this Thoughtful Pay Alert or would like assistance is assessing equity award practices, please feel free to contact Mark A. Borges at 415.462.2995 or mborges@compensia.com, or Hannah Orowitz at 332.867.0566 or horowitz@compensia.com.

About Compensia

Compensia, Inc. is a management consulting firm that provides executive compensation advisory services to Compensation Committees and senior management.

Related

Compensation Clawbacks –Surveying the Disclosures to Date

By: Mark A. Borges Download a pdf of this article » As we approach the third anniversary of the date when incentive compensation “received” is subject to clawback, we have taken a closer look at the disclosures companies have made since implementation. This Thoughtful Pay Alert summarizes our findings from reviewing publicly available disclosures of “recovery analyses” conducted between January 1, 2024 and June 30, 2026. For a detailed discussion and analysis of the clawback requirements, please see our Thoughtful

Read More

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Publishes Annual Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » ISS recently released its 2026 Governance Annual Global Benchmark Policy Survey. As in past years, ISS uses the survey to gather feedback from institutional investors, public companies, board members, and other market participants to inform its benchmark voting policies for the coming year. This year’s survey covers board elections, shareholder rights, compensation, audit and auditors, and environmental and social topics. The survey closes on Friday, August 14, 2026, at 5:00 PM ET. Below

Read More

SEC Proposes Significant Simplification of Executive Compensation Disclosure for Most Public Companies

Download a pdf of this article » On May 19, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed substantial changes to the filing categories for U.S. public company disclosure requirements. The primary intent of these changes is to reduce disclosure complexity and compliance costs to encourage more companies to go and stay public.   The proposal replaces the existing range of filer categories – large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies – with just two: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.  Non-accelerated filers, proposed as companies with a public float below $2 billion, would be eligible to follow a simplified regime akin to what is currently available to smaller reporting

Read More

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact