New Hedging Disclosure Rule Compliance Date Draws Near

Download a pdf of this article »

New Item 407(i) of Regulation S-K, the hedging disclosure rule adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2018, will soon begin to apply to certain public companies. Generally, public companies will need to disclose whether they maintain practices or policies regarding their employees’ (including officers) and directors’ ability to hedge the economic risk of owning company equity securities in their proxy and information statements which include a proposal for the election of directors during fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2019. Smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies do not have to comply with the new disclosure requirement until their first proxy and information statement containing a proposal for the election of directors during fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2020.

Thus, in the case of a public company (other than a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company) with a June 30th or September 30th fiscal year-end, such disclosure will need to be provided in its first proxy or information statement filed after fiscal year-end, even if filed in late 2019. In contrast, a company with a calendar year fiscal year-end will need to provide the required disclosure for the first time in its proxy or information statement filed during the 2020 proxy season.

As discussed in more detail in our Thoughtful Disclosure Alert, SEC Issues Final Hedging Disclosure Rule (January 18, 2019) Item 407(i) requires public companies to disclose in their proxy and information statements relating to the election of directors any practices or policies they have adopted with respect to the ability of their employees (including officers) and directors, or any of their designees, to purchase financial instruments, or otherwise engage in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the company equity securities either (i) granted to the employee or director by the company as part of their compensation or (ii) held, directly or indirectly, by the employee or director.

Other key aspects of the new disclosure requirement are as follows:

  • Companies Subject to Disclosure – New Item 407(i) applies to all companies with securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, including smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies. It does not apply to foreign private issuers or listed closed-end investment companies.
  • Compliance Dates – As noted above, for public companies that are neither smaller reporting companies nor emerging growth companies, the new Item 407(i) disclosure is required in proxy and information statements which include a proposal for the election of directors during fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2019. In the case of smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies, the new disclosure requirement is applicable for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2020. 
  • Scope of Disclosure – Companies are required either to (i) provide a fair and accurate summary of any practices or policies that apply, including the categories of persons covered and any categories of hedging transactions that are specifically permitted or disallowed or (ii) disclose their practices or policies in full. If a company does not have any practices or policies regarding hedging, it must disclose that fact or state that hedging transactions are generally permitted.
  • Covered Transactions – The SEC does not define the term “hedge,” but instead indicates that the term should be applied as a broad principle. Consequently, companies will have to evaluate their practices and policies in the context of the activities, if any, that are intended to be covered by such practices and policies to determine whether – and how – disclosure is required.
  • Coordination with CD&A Hedging Disclosure Requirement – Companies that are subject to both new Item 407(i) and Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K (which requires the inclusion of a Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the proxy or information statement) can avoid potentially duplicative disclosure by incorporating the Item 407(i) disclosure into the CD&A, either by directly setting out the information or by providing the Item 407(i) disclosure outside the CD&A and adding a cross-reference within the CD&A. Alternatively, a company may choose to keep the two disclosures separate.

Observations. Public companies that already include disclosure about their hedging policy or practices in their proxy or information statements may want to compare this disclosure against the specific requirements of new Item 407(i) to determine whether any new or different information will be needed once they are required to comply with the new rule. In our experience, many of the current disclosures about hedging policies are largely very general and don’t necessarily address the subjects contemplated by the new disclosure requirement (such as who is specifically covered by the policy and what categories of hedging transactions, if any, are specifically permitted or prohibited). Companies should determine whether any revisions to their policy are necessary or appropriate and/or ensure that their disclosure reflects the details of their policy, as well as see that their current disclosure provides a “fair and accurate” summary of the policy. In addition, companies that do not have a hedging policy may wish to consider putting one in place, or face the prospect of having to disclose this fact in their proxy or information statement.

Need Assistance?
Compensia has extensive experience in helping companies prepare the executive compensation disclosure in the proxy materials for their Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as well as analyze the potential impact of the various SEC disclosure requirements on their executive compensation programs. If you would like assistance in preparing your disclosure, or if you have any questions on the subjects addressed in this Thoughtful Disclosure Alert, please contact Mark A. Borges.

About Compensia:
Compensia, Inc. is a management consulting firm that provides executive compensation advisory services to Compensation Committees and senior management.

Related

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Glass Lewis Publishes 2025 Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) recently announced the opening of its 2025 Policy Survey. Glass Lewis conducts its annual policy survey to inform its Benchmark Voting Policy Guidelines and to gather diverse perspectives on evolving governance and compensation practices. The 2025 survey covers a wide range of topics relevant to both proxy voting and broader stewardship efforts. While some questions are tailored to institutional respondents, Glass Lewis welcomes input from all market

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact