Navigating Proxy Season Amid Uncertainty

Download a pdf of this article »

New SEC Staff Guidance on “Passive Investor” Status May Complicate Shareholder Engagement Efforts

Key Takeaways

On February 11, 2025, the SEC staff issued two updates to its Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, or C&DIs, addressing Schedule 13D/G beneficial ownership filings. The full impact of this guidance remains uncertain, but at present some major institutional investors have paused engagement activities with certain portfolio companies. As we are heading into peak proxy season, this guidance may impact companies’ abilities to engage with their largest investors as they have in years past.

Background: Schedules 13 D and 13 G

In short, shareholders that beneficially own more than 5% of a company’s voting securities are required to report their ownership with the SEC. That reporting must be done via Schedule 13D – which entails relatively onerous reporting requirements – unless the shareholder is eligible for an exemption that permits use of Schedule 13G, a “short form” filing that requires substantially less information. Those exemptions require that the investor be “passive” – i.e., they did not acquire the securities with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing the control of the issuer. Historically, large institutional investors like BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity and the like have relied on those exemptions to avail themselves of scaled back Schedule 13G filings.

What’s Changed?

The new and revised C&DIs provide updated guidance on what the SEC staff considers to be a passive investor. Previously, ordinary course engagement on topics such as corporate governance, executive compensation, and environmental or social issues would generally not preclude finding that an investor is “passive.” The new guidance indicates that if, in the course of such engagements, an investor “exerts pressure” on management to make specific changes to policies or practices, or indicates its support for a company’s director nominees may be withheld absent change that aligns with the shareholder’s expectations, it may no longer use Schedule 13G. Accordingly, investors are now assessing their engagement practices and voting guidelines relative to this new guidance, that leaves much open for question and interpretation.

Need Assistance?

Compensia has extensive experience in helping companies review their executive compensation and corporate governance policies and practices and developing disclosure of such practices in their proxy materials taking into consideration SEC disclosure requirements, proxy advisory firm policies, and investor expectations. If you would like assistance with or if you have any questions on the subjects addressed in this Thoughtful Pay Alert, please contact your regular Compensia team members or the authors of this Alert:

Mark A. Borges, Principal                Hannah Orowitz, Principal
 415.462.2995                                          332.867.0566
mborges@compensia.com                  Horowitz@compensia.com

 

Related

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Glass Lewis Publishes 2025 Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) recently announced the opening of its 2025 Policy Survey. Glass Lewis conducts its annual policy survey to inform its Benchmark Voting Policy Guidelines and to gather diverse perspectives on evolving governance and compensation practices. The 2025 survey covers a wide range of topics relevant to both proxy voting and broader stewardship efforts. While some questions are tailored to institutional respondents, Glass Lewis welcomes input from all market

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact