Looming GICS Code Changes To Affect Many Technology Companies

Download a pdf of this article »

Changes to the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) structure announced late last year 2017 to better reflect modern communication activities are set to take effect at the end of September 2018. These changes, which represent the biggest reclassification of companies in the history of GISC, will affect numerous Internet and e-commerce companies, including Google, Netflix, and Facebook. For technology companies, the changes may prompt a reassessment of their compensation peer group, as well as their understanding of how their executive compensation program will be evaluated by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), the major proxy advisory firm. This Thoughtful Pay Alert describes the pending changes and provides our initial observations on their potential implications in the months ahead.

Background

The Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) structure is an industry taxonomy developed in 1999 by S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI, Inc. for use by the global financial community.  The GICS structure currently consists of 11 sectors, 24 industry groups, 68 industries, and 157 sub-industries into which Standard & Poor’s has categorized all major public companies. The GICS structure is used as a basis for Standard & Poor’s and MSCI’s financial market indexes in which each company is assigned to a sub-industry, and to a corresponding industry, industry group, and sector, according to the definition of its principal business activity.

In addition, the major proxy advisory firms, particularly Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS), use the GICS structure in their modeling analytics when formulating their voting recommendations on matters to be submitted for shareholder action at a company’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Changes to the GICS Structure

On November 17, 2017, S&P Dow Jones and MSCI announced revisions to the GICS structure “to reflect the evolution in the mode in which people communicate and access entertainment content and other information.” Citing this evolution as a result of the integration between telecommunications, media, and internet companies, the proposed revisions are as follows:

  • The “Telecommunication Services” sector will be broadened and renamed the “Communication Services” sector;
  • Media companies will move from the “Consumer Discretionary” sector to the “Communication Services” sector;
  • Internet services companies will move from the “Information Technology” sector to the “Communication Services” sector; and
  • E-commerce companies will move from the “Information Technology” sector to the “Consumer Discretionary” sector.

These changes are to be effective on September 28, 2018.

Implications for ISS Analyses

ISS uses the GICS structure classifications to construct compensation peer groups that are used in formulating its voting recommendations on compensation-related proposals submitted for shareholder action at companies’ annual meeting of shareholders, including the “Say-on-Pay” and employee stock plan proposals.

Although it is difficult to predict how the pending reclassifications will affect the analysis of a given company’s specific situation, we envision that changes could occur in these areas of ISS focus:

  • Summary of a company’s total shareholder return performance (on a one-, three-, and five-year basis) relative to companies with similar GICS classifications;
  • Construction of peer groups for purposes of pay benchmarking and relative “pay-for-performance” comparisons;
  • Review of the relative alignment of the compensation of a company’s CEO as part of its quantitative screen for evaluating an executive compensation program in connection with
    formulating Say-on-Pay proposal voting recommendations;
  • Review of the compensation arrangements for the non-employee members of a company’s Board of Directors relative to the competitive market for purposes of identifying “excessive compensation” practices;
  • Review of new or amended employee stock plans to determine the shareholder value transfer and gross burn rate relative to companies with similar GICS classifications; and
  • Calculation of a company’s “QualityScore,” which considers specific corporate governance and executive compensation-related policies and practices relative to GICS-based industry norms.

Initial Observations
While some of the changes that will result from the GISC structure reclassification will be nominal (for example, grouping internet software and other software companies together), other changes may have significant ramifications for how companies will be evaluated for comparative purposes (for example, moving internet retail companies from the “Information Technology” sector to the “Consumer Discretionary” sector). The most prominent technology companies affected by the changes, along with their new proposed classifications, are listed on Exhibit A to this article.

About the Authors
The authors of this Thoughtful Pay Alert are Mark Borges and Jason Borrevik, principals at Compensia. If you have any questions about this Thoughtful Pay Alert or the implications of the changes to the GICS structures generally, Mark can be reached at 415.462.2995 or mborges@compensia.com and Jason can be reached at 408.876.4035 or jborrevik@compensia.com.

Need Assistance?
Compensia has significant experience in helping companies understand and address ISS’ corporate governance and executive compensation policies. If you have any questions on the topics covered in this Thoughtful Pay Alert or would like assistance is assessing how the policies are likely to affect your executive compensation program, please feel free to contact Jason Borrevik or Mark A. Borges.

EXHIBIT A
(as disclosed as of
August 2018)

Related

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Glass Lewis Publishes 2025 Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) recently announced the opening of its 2025 Policy Survey. Glass Lewis conducts its annual policy survey to inform its Benchmark Voting Policy Guidelines and to gather diverse perspectives on evolving governance and compensation practices. The 2025 survey covers a wide range of topics relevant to both proxy voting and broader stewardship efforts. While some questions are tailored to institutional respondents, Glass Lewis welcomes input from all market

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact