Looming GICS Code Changes To Affect Many Technology Companies

Download a pdf of this article »

Changes to the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) structure announced late last year 2017 to better reflect modern communication activities are set to take effect at the end of September 2018. These changes, which represent the biggest reclassification of companies in the history of GISC, will affect numerous Internet and e-commerce companies, including Google, Netflix, and Facebook. For technology companies, the changes may prompt a reassessment of their compensation peer group, as well as their understanding of how their executive compensation program will be evaluated by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), the major proxy advisory firm. This Thoughtful Pay Alert describes the pending changes and provides our initial observations on their potential implications in the months ahead.

Background

The Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) structure is an industry taxonomy developed in 1999 by S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI, Inc. for use by the global financial community.  The GICS structure currently consists of 11 sectors, 24 industry groups, 68 industries, and 157 sub-industries into which Standard & Poor’s has categorized all major public companies. The GICS structure is used as a basis for Standard & Poor’s and MSCI’s financial market indexes in which each company is assigned to a sub-industry, and to a corresponding industry, industry group, and sector, according to the definition of its principal business activity.

In addition, the major proxy advisory firms, particularly Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS), use the GICS structure in their modeling analytics when formulating their voting recommendations on matters to be submitted for shareholder action at a company’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Changes to the GICS Structure

On November 17, 2017, S&P Dow Jones and MSCI announced revisions to the GICS structure “to reflect the evolution in the mode in which people communicate and access entertainment content and other information.” Citing this evolution as a result of the integration between telecommunications, media, and internet companies, the proposed revisions are as follows:

  • The “Telecommunication Services” sector will be broadened and renamed the “Communication Services” sector;
  • Media companies will move from the “Consumer Discretionary” sector to the “Communication Services” sector;
  • Internet services companies will move from the “Information Technology” sector to the “Communication Services” sector; and
  • E-commerce companies will move from the “Information Technology” sector to the “Consumer Discretionary” sector.

These changes are to be effective on September 28, 2018.

Implications for ISS Analyses

ISS uses the GICS structure classifications to construct compensation peer groups that are used in formulating its voting recommendations on compensation-related proposals submitted for shareholder action at companies’ annual meeting of shareholders, including the “Say-on-Pay” and employee stock plan proposals.

Although it is difficult to predict how the pending reclassifications will affect the analysis of a given company’s specific situation, we envision that changes could occur in these areas of ISS focus:

  • Summary of a company’s total shareholder return performance (on a one-, three-, and five-year basis) relative to companies with similar GICS classifications;
  • Construction of peer groups for purposes of pay benchmarking and relative “pay-for-performance” comparisons;
  • Review of the relative alignment of the compensation of a company’s CEO as part of its quantitative screen for evaluating an executive compensation program in connection with
    formulating Say-on-Pay proposal voting recommendations;
  • Review of the compensation arrangements for the non-employee members of a company’s Board of Directors relative to the competitive market for purposes of identifying “excessive compensation” practices;
  • Review of new or amended employee stock plans to determine the shareholder value transfer and gross burn rate relative to companies with similar GICS classifications; and
  • Calculation of a company’s “QualityScore,” which considers specific corporate governance and executive compensation-related policies and practices relative to GICS-based industry norms.

Initial Observations
While some of the changes that will result from the GISC structure reclassification will be nominal (for example, grouping internet software and other software companies together), other changes may have significant ramifications for how companies will be evaluated for comparative purposes (for example, moving internet retail companies from the “Information Technology” sector to the “Consumer Discretionary” sector). The most prominent technology companies affected by the changes, along with their new proposed classifications, are listed on Exhibit A to this article.

About the Authors
The authors of this Thoughtful Pay Alert are Mark Borges and Jason Borrevik, principals at Compensia. If you have any questions about this Thoughtful Pay Alert or the implications of the changes to the GICS structures generally, Mark can be reached at 415.462.2995 or mborges@compensia.com and Jason can be reached at 408.876.4035 or jborrevik@compensia.com.

Need Assistance?
Compensia has significant experience in helping companies understand and address ISS’ corporate governance and executive compensation policies. If you have any questions on the topics covered in this Thoughtful Pay Alert or would like assistance is assessing how the policies are likely to affect your executive compensation program, please feel free to contact Jason Borrevik or Mark A. Borges.

EXHIBIT A
(as disclosed as of
August 2018)

Related

Compensation Clawbacks –Surveying the Disclosures to Date

By: Mark A. Borges Download a pdf of this article » As we approach the third anniversary of the date when incentive compensation “received” is subject to clawback, we have taken a closer look at the disclosures companies have made since implementation. This Thoughtful Pay Alert summarizes our findings from reviewing publicly available disclosures of “recovery analyses” conducted between January 1, 2024 and June 30, 2026. For a detailed discussion and analysis of the clawback requirements, please see our Thoughtful

Read More

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Publishes Annual Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » ISS recently released its 2026 Governance Annual Global Benchmark Policy Survey. As in past years, ISS uses the survey to gather feedback from institutional investors, public companies, board members, and other market participants to inform its benchmark voting policies for the coming year. This year’s survey covers board elections, shareholder rights, compensation, audit and auditors, and environmental and social topics. The survey closes on Friday, August 14, 2026, at 5:00 PM ET. Below

Read More

SEC Proposes Significant Simplification of Executive Compensation Disclosure for Most Public Companies

Download a pdf of this article » On May 19, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed substantial changes to the filing categories for U.S. public company disclosure requirements. The primary intent of these changes is to reduce disclosure complexity and compliance costs to encourage more companies to go and stay public.   The proposal replaces the existing range of filer categories – large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies – with just two: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.  Non-accelerated filers, proposed as companies with a public float below $2 billion, would be eligible to follow a simplified regime akin to what is currently available to smaller reporting

Read More

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact