Executive Security Arrangements: Top of Mind In 2025

Download a pdf of this article »

Disclosure Requirement Refresh, Market Practices, and Key Considerations

Although the number of perquisites and other personal benefits offered to corporate executives continues to decline, one notable exception to this trend has been personal security arrangements. And, with recent events presenting a reminder of our turbulent times, we expect to see boards of directors implement new security arrangements or modify existing programs in the days ahead as both publicly traded and privately-held companies assess the increasing visibility and vulnerability of their key executives and focus on the adequacy of the precautions they have in place to safeguard their organization and minimize risks to their leaders.

While companies generally view all executive security arrangements to be an “ordinary and necessary” business expense, the Securities and Exchange Commission takes the position that the provision of personal security must be analyzed to determine whether it constitutes a “perquisite” reportable as part of a company’s executive compensation disclosure. Even though the cost of providing perquisites and other personal benefits to executives is relatively small when compared to their overall compensation packages, not to mention overall corporate expenditures, investors remain interested in a company’s “perk” practices; typically, closely scrutinizing the disclosure of this subject. Given the heightened attention being given to executive security arrangements at the present time, this Thoughtful Disclosure Alert provides a summary of current disclosure requirements, security practices in the technology and life sciences sectors, and other key considerations.

Refresh of Current SEC Disclosure Requirements

Thoughtful Disclosure Alert – 2024 Personal Security Arrangements for Executives (01-14-25)

Security Arrangements – A Reasonable Business Expense or a Personal Benefit?

Many companies believe that the provision of security arrangements constitutes a reasonable business expense. Prior to approval, the Board of Directors often commissions a “security study” to document the existence of a bona fide business-oriented security concern that requires creation of a formal security program. (Typically, for federal income tax purposes, such a study is a prerequisite to the deductibility of expenses incurred for security services.) Notwithstanding the conclusion that a security program is necessary, the SEC’s current position regarding personal security arrangements often results in some portion of the program being reported as a perquisite. For each company, what is ultimately reported is a “facts and circumstances” determination taking into consideration which program components (if any) may provide some personal benefit.

Market Practices – Disclosed Personal Security Amounts Continue to Rise

Perquisites and other personal benefits overall have generally tended to represent a nominal portion of executive pay packages and experienced further decline in recent years as these offerings narrowed among public companies. Contrary to this overall trend, security arrangements have expanded in type (such as home security systems, personal security monitoring, and private secure transportation) and cost.

Based on proxy statement disclosures for S&P 500 and Russell 3000 companies with fiscal year ends September 2023 through August 2024 (the most recent year for which data is available):

  • 24% of S&P 500 companies disclosed personal security arrangements with a value of $10,000 or more for specified named executive officers during the year. In many instances, these arrangements were limited to the Chief Executive Officer. Where reported, the aggregate incremental cost to the company of such arrangements varied significantly, ranging from approximately $11,000 to approximately $9.4 million. 2% of non-S&P 500 Russell 3000 companies disclosed such arrangements, with values ranging from $54,000 to $3.7 million.

  • Among all S&P 500 and Russell 3000 companies, 49 disclosed personal security arrangements costing more than $250,000, with an average of $1.4 million across these 49 companies. Technology and technology-related entertainment industry companies represent approximately 40% of this group, followed by financial industry companies (20%).

A Pragmatic Take on Future Disclosure

In light of many companies’ views that all security arrangements (both business and personal) are a necessary and integral aspect of the performance of executives’ jobs and the views of some institutional shareholders and the SEC that these arrangements should be disclosed as a perquisite, thorough disclosure of these arrangements is important. While there is no indication that the SEC will change its long-standing position that personal security-related costs may be considered reportable benefits, it seems possible that investors may be more reticent to taking a critical view of necessary security related costs in the near term. In view of recent events, if a company’s disclosure appropriately addresses the need, and rationale, for such security arrangements, the dollar amount disclosed as a perquisite is likely to be better understood. Committees considering adjustments to, or introduction of, personal security arrangements for named executive officers should ensure the Board of Directors’ decision making is grounded in an informed and thorough risk management process involving the compensation, legal, and risk functions. This process may include, among other things:

 

Need Assistance?

Compensia has extensive experience in helping companies establish executive compensation programs and practices and developing disclosure of such practices in their proxy materials taking into consideration SEC disclosure requirements, proxy advisory firm policies, and investor expectations. If you would like assistance with or if you have any questions on the subjects addressed in this Thoughtful Disclosure Alert, please contact your regular Compensia team members or the authors of this Alert:

Mark A. Borges, Principal           Jodie Dane, Principal
 415.462.2995                                    415.462.1985
 mborges@compensia.com           jdane@compensia.com

 

Related

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Glass Lewis Publishes 2025 Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) recently announced the opening of its 2025 Policy Survey. Glass Lewis conducts its annual policy survey to inform its Benchmark Voting Policy Guidelines and to gather diverse perspectives on evolving governance and compensation practices. The 2025 survey covers a wide range of topics relevant to both proxy voting and broader stewardship efforts. While some questions are tailored to institutional respondents, Glass Lewis welcomes input from all market

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact