Employee Stock Plan Proposals at the Bay Area 150

Even with the spotlight clearly focused on the new shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”) during the 2011 proxy season, it was another bountiful year for employee stock plan proposals (that is, proposals to either adopt a new employee stock plan or increase the share reserve for an existing plan) within the public technology company community.

As in prior years, Compensia has monitored the employee stock plan proposals – and related voting results – for the 150 largest high-technology and life sciences companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area (primarily in Silicon Valley), which we call the Bay Area 150.

This Thoughtful Pay Alert summarizes our findings from these results for the past 12 months, based on the Exchange Act reports of these companies as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Number of Employee Stock Plan Proposals Remained Robust in 2011

Results of Say-on-Pay VoteNearly one-third of the companies in the Bay Area 150 submitted proposals to either adopt a new employee stock plan or increase the share reserve for an existing plan for shareholder action during the past 12 months (the period from June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011); a number that was in line with the number of proposals submitted to shareholders for the prior 12-month period (June 1, 2009 through May 31, 2010).

The consistency in the number of proposals among the Bay Area 150 companies from 2010 to 2011 is likely the result of the typical life cycle for an employee stock plan. Based on the general “rule of thumb” that mature public companies seek to replenish their employee stock plan share reserves, or adopt a new plan with a new reserve, approximately every two to three years, these results suggest that, in an any given year, about one-third of the Bay Area 150 is going through the process – and attendant scrutiny – of seeking shareholder approval for an employee stock plan. This pattern is also a consequence of the dilution policies of the major proxy advisory firms, such as Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), and some institutional investors, which typically limit the number of shares that they will authorize for equity compensation purposes at any given time.

Size of Share Reserve Requests Flat in 2011

Among the 49 companies that sought shareholder approval of a new employee stock plan or share reserve increase in 2011, the average share pool request (as a percentage of the company’s outstanding shares) was up slightly in 2011 (5.71% compared to 5.48% in 2010). The actual requests were as high as 17.70% (4,500,000 shares) at Coherent, Inc.

In addition to Coherent, five other companies sought shareholder approval for share reserve increases in excess of 10% of their outstanding shares – Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. (15.19%), Synaptics, Inc. (14.06%), Ultratech (12.91%), OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (12.09%), and Netflix, Inc. (10.86%). One other company, Intuit, Inc. was close, with a proposal for a 9.90% increase.

Virtually All Employee Stock Plan Proposals Approved in 2011

Only one of the 47 companies that have reported the results from their annual meeting of shareholders in the past 12 months has disclosed that its shareholders rejected its employee stock plan proposal. All the other proposals were approved, with an average favorable vote of 75.2% of the votes cast (which was largely consistent with the average level of support in 2010 – 74.5%). Initially, Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. reported that its shareholders had failed to approve its employee stock plan proposal. Subsequently, however, the company adjusted its share request and the proposal was overwhelmingly approved before the end of the year.

Results of Say-on-Pay Vote

Observations

Shareholder support of employee stock plan proposals in 2011 was down somewhat from 2010. Twenty-two of the companies reporting the results of their employee stock plan proposals (44.9%) garnered less than 75% support among the votes cast. This contrasts sharply from 2010, when only 22 of the 54 companies conducting employee stock plan votes (40.7%) received less than 75% support. While this change is likely attributable to the change in national stock exchange rules prohibiting broker voting of uninstructed shares on compensation-related matters, it’s also a reflection of the greater scrutiny being given to employee stock plan proposals generally.

While some exceptions were evident, generally speaking proposals involving share amounts ranging between 2.5% – 4% of a company’s outstanding shares tended to generate between 75% to 85% support from shareholders. Once outside this range, however, the vote outcome could be more problematic.

Need Assistance?

Compensia has extensive experience in assisting companies in formulating employee stock plan proposals and developing effective strategies for obtaining shareholder approval of such proposals. If you would like assistance in analyzing your equity compensation strategy or negotiating the various pressure points in implementing an employee stock plan or a share reserve increase, or if you have any questions on the subjects addressed in this Thoughtful Pay Alert, please feel free to contact Jason Borrevik, Mark A. Borges, or any of our other consultants.

Download a pdf of this article »

Related

Compensation Clawbacks –Surveying the Disclosures to Date

By: Mark A. Borges Download a pdf of this article » As we approach the third anniversary of the date when incentive compensation “received” is subject to clawback, we have taken a closer look at the disclosures companies have made since implementation. This Thoughtful Pay Alert summarizes our findings from reviewing publicly available disclosures of “recovery analyses” conducted between January 1, 2024 and June 30, 2026. For a detailed discussion and analysis of the clawback requirements, please see our Thoughtful

Read More

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) Publishes Annual Policy Survey

Download a pdf of this article » ISS recently released its 2026 Governance Annual Global Benchmark Policy Survey. As in past years, ISS uses the survey to gather feedback from institutional investors, public companies, board members, and other market participants to inform its benchmark voting policies for the coming year. This year’s survey covers board elections, shareholder rights, compensation, audit and auditors, and environmental and social topics. The survey closes on Friday, August 14, 2026, at 5:00 PM ET. Below

Read More

SEC Proposes Significant Simplification of Executive Compensation Disclosure for Most Public Companies

Download a pdf of this article » On May 19, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed substantial changes to the filing categories for U.S. public company disclosure requirements. The primary intent of these changes is to reduce disclosure complexity and compliance costs to encourage more companies to go and stay public.   The proposal replaces the existing range of filer categories – large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies – with just two: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.  Non-accelerated filers, proposed as companies with a public float below $2 billion, would be eligible to follow a simplified regime akin to what is currently available to smaller reporting

Read More

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact