Companies Should Verify Data For ISS “QuickScore” by February 15

Recently, Institutional Shareholder Services, the major proxy advisory firm, announced an overhaul of its corporate governance risk assessment tool, Governance Risk Indicators (“GRId”). Now titled “ISS Governance Quickscore,” this new database is intended to enable ISS’ clients to identify potential governance risks that may be present in their portfolio companies (which was the primary purpose of GRId). The transition to the new system, which will include review of four general areas – shareholder rights, compensation, audit practices, and board structure, will take place in late February or early March.

Please note that, while QuickScore does not directly impact the ISS methodology for formulating its voting recommendation on shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay” proposals), the two analytics share many of the same comparative criteria.

ISS has announced that companies have until February 15, 2013 to verify their data in the QuickScore database before the database is made available to its clients. Companies that verify their data before February 8, 2013 will receive feedback from ISS by February 15, 2013.

Data verification can be conducted at the following location »

We strongly encourage you to verify your data before this deadline.
Further information about QuickScore and how it will work can be found at the following link »

Please contact your Compensia engagement manager with any questions on the verification process or for further assistance.

Download a pdf of this article »

Related

SEC Proposes Significant Simplification of Executive Compensation Disclosure for Most Public Companies

Download a pdf of this article » On May 19, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed substantial changes to the filing categories for U.S. public company disclosure requirements. The primary intent of these changes is to reduce disclosure complexity and compliance costs to encourage more companies to go and stay public.   The proposal replaces the existing range of filer categories – large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies – with just two: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.  Non-accelerated filers, proposed as companies with a public float below $2 billion, would be eligible to follow a simplified regime akin to what is currently available to smaller reporting

Read More

At an Inflection Point: Long-Term Incentive Design Post-ISS/Glass Lewis Ascendancy

Download a pdf of this article » For more than a decade, long-term incentive programs have largely converged around a single model: a mix of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based awards (primarily PSUs), with 50% or higher weighting on the PSUs. The convergence on this model was driven more by proxy advisor expectations than business strategy. Two recent developments signal a major shift toward flexibility and innovation: ISS Policy Updates: ISS’s 2026 benchmark equity mix policy now recognizes that

Read More

Updating Proxy Advisor Peer Groups Ahead of 2026 Annual Meetings

Download a pdf of this article » For companies holding annual meetings February 1, 2026 through September 15, 2026, ISS’s peer group submission window is now open, through 8 PM ET on Friday, November 21st. We anticipate Glass Lewis’s window will also open in the near future. During this period, companies can update their self-constructed compensation peer groups for use in proxy advisors’ upcoming executive pay assessments. Absent a submission, both ISS and Glass Lewis will default to the peer

Read More

Have we reached the end of standardized proxy advisor voting recommendations? The looming ISS and Glass Lewis policy shifts

Download a pdf of this article » Overview In October, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”) each announced major changes to their governance research models that mark a decisive shift away from standardized “benchmark” voting recommendations, towards a broad reorientation of the proxy advisor landscape centered on investor-specific customization – a change that is consistent with investors’ diversifying views regarding compensation program design that have led to questioning legacy views regarding the effectiveness

Read More

Connect with us

Receive our periodic news and publications

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive emails from us. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact